Author’s Note: This article was written before the 2024 Massachusetts Elections.
In the upcoming November general election, Massachusetts voters will confront five major ballot measures addressing a range of issues, from legislative oversight to labor rights to drug legalization. This election cycle marks the greatest number of ballot measures since 2000, when voters weighed in on eight initiatives. These measures are particularly significant, as polling has revealed that two of them have deeply divided the electorate, underscoring the importance of voter participation.
The first ballot measure considers expanding the powers of the state auditor, an independently elected official, to investigate the financial practices of the legislature. A simple yes or no vote will determine whether the auditor can scrutinize legislative spending, with the goal of increasing transparency. Proponents argue that this oversight will enhance public trust by shedding light on governmental operations. However, critics suggest that without legislative cooperation, the auditor’s oversight could face resistance or legal obstacles, limiting its effectiveness. According to a University of Massachusetts Amherst poll, 63 percent of Massachusetts residents support this measure, while only 11 percent oppose it. While this measure has gained significant support, its practical impact may be limited without the inclusion of enforcement powers for the auditor.
The second measure focuses on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam, which public high school students must currently pass in order to graduate. A yes vote would eliminate this statewide requirement, allowing individual school districts to establish their own standards. A no vote would maintain the current system. Supporters argue that removing the MCAS requirement would benefit students with learning challenges and provide more equitable graduation criteria. Detractors, however, worry that the change could lead to inconsistent academic standards across districts. Polls show a close split: 53 percent in favor, 36 percent opposed, and 11 percent undecided. The 4.8 percent margin of error makes it an even more competitive issue.
The third measure would allow rideshare drivers, such as those working for Uber and Lyft, to unionize under a sector-based bargaining model, a novel concept in the United States. Currently, these drivers cannot legally form unions. Advocates argue that this change could improve working conditions and promote fair labor practices, while opponents warn it could raise ride prices, reduce demand, and lead to legal complications. This proposal enjoys significant support, with nearly 60 percent of those surveyed indicating plans to vote yes, compared to 27 percent opposed.
The fourth measure would decriminalize the personal use of certain psychedelics, including psilocybin and mescaline, and allow licensed professionals to administer them in therapeutic settings. Proponents highlight research suggesting potential mental health benefits, while opponents express concerns about health risks and potential misuse. Polls reveal a deadlock, with 43 percent in favor and 43 percent opposed. According to analysts, this divide is driven by age and political affiliation: although Massachusetts typically votes Democratic, the state’s majority of independent voters creates a nuanced political landscape. Younger Democratic voters tend to support this measure, whereas older Republicans and unaffiliated voters generally oppose it.
The fifth measure proposes raising the minimum hourly wage for tipped workers from 6.75 dollars to match the general minimum wage of 15 dollars by January 2029. Supporters argue that this change would address wage disparities and economic fairness, while opponents worry about the impact on businesses. This measure currently has 61 percent support among surveyed voters, with 27 percent opposed.
Concord Academy (CA) students and faculty have voiced diverse opinions on these measures. Senior Adan de Waal ’25, who is voting for the first time, expressed support for keeping the MCAS requirement. “It must remain in place as it is the only graduation requirement currently in effect, and removing it could diminish the significance of a high school diploma,” he said. Fellow senior Gabby O’Leary ’25, also a first-time voter, emphasized the importance of union rights: “The measure to allow rideshare drivers to unionize is critical for helping to rebuild the significance and prevalence of unions in the United States,” said Gabby
Christine Cevallos-Lozano, Head of House and boarding student advocate, shared her thoughts on the psychedelic measure, saying “I think there are proven benefits to psychedelics, but I am concerned about how states like Oregon have handled the legalization of substances.” Interim History Department Chair Jeffrey Richey reflected on the tipped minimum wage measure, noting, “The U.S. has a unique approach to labor and restaurant worker compensation, especially when compared to Latin America and Europe.” He urged consideration for only the immediate impacts of raising the wage, but also for the broader implications on the U.S. labor system.
This election cycle promises to be consequential for Massachusetts, shaping policies that could set new precedents both locally and nationally.
Editor's Note: As of November 9, 2024, Question 1 has passed with a resounding 71.6 percent of the vote. Questions 2 and 3 were much closer, but also both passed with 59 percent and a 53.8 percent of the vote respective. Questions 4 and 5 were rejected, with only 42.9 percent and 35.9 percent of the vote respectively.